As I have set to demonstrate in the previous instalment of this series, although in a succinct fashion, the course of global affairs, in all its industries, sectors, fields and domains, has been steered by an unholy alliance. Tracing its roots to the 19th century, its genesis was made up of powerful and influential loyalists to the British throne, major bankers and brokers, as well as industry magnates, of which the petroleum tycoons have exerted the greatest influence. In that regard, John D. Rockefeller and his descendants have mastered the art of moulding policies and practices to their advantage. Continuing with this exposition, the Great War and the experiments carried out in this period made a definite and lasting impression on this clique. Undoubtedly, it set off a paradigm shift that prolongs to this day. Little by little, the cabal has conquered and absorbed ever more resources, sway and privileges to the detriment of everyone else’s natural rights and liberties. Casting upon their success in the petrol business, the ‘oiligarchy’ had the brilliant idea of branching out to the field of medicine. In 1901, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was established and had as its first director Simon Flexner, who was a pathology professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Coincidentally, his brother, Abraham, who was an educator, was hired by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching to write a report on the state of the American medical education system. Accordingly, the seminal study that came to be known as the Flexner Report was released in 1910. Along with the various examinations on medical research funded by the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations, a total turnaround of the practice of medicine was accomplished with great success in the end. Hence, the traditional forms of healthcare that resorted to un-patentable natural remedies and cures, namely Naturopathy or Homeopathy, were downgraded as quackery. To please the patrons, the grantees that produced these inquiries unsurprisingly concluded that only drug-based allopathic medicine, requiring expensive medical procedures and lengthy hospital stays, was to be taken seriously. Besides being a profitable endeavour on its own, the fact that the allopathic drugs were (and still are) a by-product of the petrochemical industry which, as the name indicates, was itself partially an offshoot of the petroleum business, this occasioned very lucrative synergies. Ever since then, new-fangled by-products and gainful synergies spawned from these and other industries too have been generated. Due to possessing an unbridled ambition to fulfil their objectives, once the oil, chemical, pharmaceutical and medical industries, and the banking system to boot, were under their command, the cabal aimed at controlling other strategic sectors. Therefore, the cabal’s next step was to have domain over the production of food. To begin with, they engendered the Green Revolution. Starting in 1943, when plant geneticist and Rockefeller Foundation researcher Norman Borlaug and his team arrived in Mexico, for whatever increase in yields it brought about, it also created markets for the petrochemical industry. In addition, it gave rise to the “ABCD” seed cartel of Archer-Daniels-Midland, Bunge, Cargill and Louis-Dreyfus. As a result, these companies, along with their associated interests in the food packaging and processing industry, formed the core of American "agribusiness", a concept developed at Harvard Business School in the 1950’s, with the help of research conducted by Wassily Leontief for the Rockefeller Foundation. Building upon this, the ‘oiligarchy’ initiated the Gene Revolution, with the main characters involved being almost identical to the players in the Green Revolution. Besides the familiar names associated with the ‘oiligarchy’, such as Dow AgroScience, DuPont Biotechnology, and, of course, Monsanto, two other players shared the spoils of the GMO bonanza. These were Bayer CropScience and BASF PlantScience, the offspring of the German industrial conglomerate IG Farben, which had long been a partner in crime of the Rockefellers and the other ‘oiligarchs’. Needless to say, these ventures have all been funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and fellow philanthropists at the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and like-minded organisations. Indeed, the international banking cabal has jumped from success to success, taking control over more and more industries and markets. Nevertheless, these sociopaths are not done yet. What they eventually seek is the monopolisation of life itself – and I am not simply referring to the process of patenting the human gene pool. [T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.” Although it sounds ludicrous and hard to believe, this global conspiracy has certainly been in the making, pushing levers behind the scenes and in the shadows. Obviously, this secretive and covert modus operandi has to be the case. If they want to carry out their plans for world domination, then the public must be kept uninformed and oblivious, in a state of complete deception. Be that as it may, to a certain extent, the population has itself to blame. Over the years, there have been many people that have revealed this information to the public. In 1966, the Georgetown University historian Carroll Quigley did just that. What makes his testimony even more fascinating and heightens his credibility is the fact that he actually espoused their goals. However, in view of sounding rather fanciful, not to mention a herculean task, to the unsuspected crowd, they simply dismiss this swindle outright. At any rate, as Quigley affirmed, the goal of the banking cartel was to restore the medieval economic system and social structure called feudalism, or at least some semblance of it. This entailed that the progress made since and triggered by the Enlightenment and its ideals were to be reversed. Several questions come to mind. Why would they do this? What is their rationale? How would they accomplish this? are the most pertinent and necessary to ask and to look for the answers. Notwithstanding, the readers by getting this far already have a pretty good inkling of what is going on. In fact, they are already in the know with regards to the first question. All the same, owing to being very nuanced and complex, a straight answer to each one cannot be given. In reality, there are many facets and variables at play. On top of that, they are all intertwined. Consequently, I have to constantly be going back and forth and jumping from one theme to another, but this is all in a day’s work. On that account, let me go back to the turn of the 20th century, when establishing tax-free foundations became fashionable. The reason these were created was for them to be agents of change via the guise of philanthropy. In any event, hardly is the case that all charitable organisations have a secret evil agenda, or even that those founded and funded by this globalist elite never engage in actual altruistic and humanitarian work. Indeed, it is the beneficence that is displayed most of the time that has managed to fool the public. Drawing inspiration from financier and the business partner of JP Morgan’s father, George Peabody, dubbed “the father of modern philanthropy”, Rockefeller’s General Education Board, and later on his Foundation, and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (mentioned on the previous post) were modelled after the Peabody Education Fund. Naturally, these charities were not meant to merely provide education to the poor or to improve its quality and scope for the masses. Unmistakably, they had ulterior motives. Fortunately, these motives were revealed in the early 1950’s by the Reece Committee, which was a Congressional investigation into the activities of these tax-free foundations. Beginning with congressman Edward E. Cox and then B. Carroll Reece taking the helm in April 1954, Norman Dodd, who had a vast experience in Wall Street, was picked to be director of research in 1953. In his final report, he concluded that these entities and their trustees intended to revolutionise, silently and imperceptibly, the way society thought and functioned. Obviously, to achieve this, the control of education and schooling was crucial. In spite of Peabody being the pioneer, Rockefeller and Carnegie were the real trailblazers, perfecting this method of using charity as a vehicle for social reform and advancing their own megalomaniacal interests. Albeit keen on administering the nation’s education system, they soon realised that this was not enough. As Norman Dodd discovered, once the trustees got together to discuss how to pursue their goals, they deduced that war was the most effective means. Exactly what Bernard Baruch figured out after the Great War. When the Armistice ensued in 1918, the cabal hurried to preclude the return to the pre-war status quo. Plainly, the commonalty had to be taught the previous individualistic and true capitalistic paradigm was obsolete. If you will, laissez faire became démodé. In truth, a new world order had just emerged. At the outset, though, this clique had to find, wait for or manufacture some major conflict – not some small one of the likes of the Spanish-American War – and the citizenry had to be persuaded and deceived into supporting a belligerent stance. In point of fact, the ball started rolling in the 1890’s, set in motion by JP Morgan and his associates. Thus, the crusade on educational reform and ideological transformation needed to be complemented with other fronts. In addition to gaining the helm of the State Department and its foreign policy, which was essential to involve the nation in the war, the elite had to infiltrate and subjugate the rest of the government and steer the conduction of scientific debate and research of strategic fields, specially economic thought. Visibly, this is where Milner’s Kindergarten and the groups formed to create the world envisioned by Cecil Rhodes enter the picture. To this whole apparatus that aims at establishing what was later labelled the New World Order (NWO), war is nothing more than a means to an end. As a matter of fact, the use of war, conflict and armed insurrection are one of its primary methods to work towards the goal of one world government under the control of the banking and corporate elite. Once you know this, even mainstream interpretations of history render this glaringly obvious. Every significant conflict ends in a negotiated peace conference and every negotiation establishes further centralisation of power within larger regional bodies or intergovernmental organisations, consistently eroding sovereignty and consolidating power. Evidently, war is a racket. Following the end of WWI, representatives of the NWO, who formed the core of the American and British delegations to the Paris Peace Conference, convened to expand the system of international think tanks that would enable them to rule from the shadows to this day. At Versailles, the British and US historical staffs took the occasion to create a permanent organisation to agitate for the desired constitution of the Anglo-American Empire. The new group, the Institute of International Affairs, was formed at a meeting at the Majestic Hotel in Paris on May 30, 1919. The British branch, which received royal ascent in 1920, became the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA). On the other side of the pond, the American branch was formed as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1921, having as its honorary chairman the lawyer Elihu Root, who had the honour of having both the Morgans and the Carnegies as clients – also, after his stint in government as Secretary of War and of State under the McKinley and the Teddy Roosevelt administrations, respectively, he headed the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and was vice-president of the Pilgrims Society after the Great War. Although the CFR had in its ranks many financiers, industrialists and lawyers, who helped finance this new institution, from the onset it was reigned by the House of Morgan. Only later, from the 1930’s onwards did it become a Rockefeller affair. During a war, the conflict does not restrict itself to boots on the ground, armoured vehicles, navy ships and fighter jets. Amongst other features, there is an information war, not just towards the enemy, but towards the fellow countrymen. Taking seed money from his scion wife Dorothy Whitney, who belonged to the politically well-connected Whitney family and closely allied with the Morgans, Willard W. Straight, partner of J.P. Morgan & Co., founded the New Republic magazine. Initially, it went along the lines of Teddy Roosevelt’s New Nationalism due to its most influential editor, Herbert David Croly, being a veteran collectivist and Rooseveltian theoretician. His other two co-editors were Walter Edward Weyl, another scholar of the New Nationalism, and the young, ambitious former official of the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, the future pundit Walter Lippmann. However, as Woodrow Wilson was preparing to lead the US into WWI, this magazine became an enthusiastic supporter of it, and practically a spokesman for the Wilson war effort, the wartime collectivist economy, and the envisaged new society shaped by the war. The common interests very largely elude public opinion entirely, and can be managed only by a specialized class whose personal interests reach beyond the locality.” Despite the alteration in its editorial direction, this was merely a tiny change of course and absolutely unsurprising. Before there was a progressive movement, or before it acquired a high level of popularity in academia and society in general, its leading intellectuals were engaged to other collectivist camps. For instance, the most prominent progressivist of this era was Professor John Dewey of Columbia University, who was a postmillennial pietist before becoming a pragmatist and secular humanist, as well as a key figure in the globalist-led front for educational reform. In spite of the Christian creed dropping out of the picture, the intellectuals and activists continued to possess the same evangelical zeal for the salvation of the world that their parents and they themselves had once possessed. In short, the world would (and must still) be saved through progressivism and statism. Another striking example was the lad Lippmann. Once at the New Republic, this socialist helped lead the parade of progressive and socialist sages in favour of the US joining the Allies’ bellicose endeavour. Contemplating the centralised war economies that the warring nations in Europe were experiencing, the New Republic eagerly looked forward to the imminent collectivisation in America, surely expecting “immense gains in national efficiency and happiness.” Curiously, while they were aware the central planning in Europe was being done through tyrannical means, in the other side of the Atlantic Ocean those means would achieve democratic ends, somehow. Hardly had President Wilson announced the US entry into WWI when Lippman started his attempt at weaselling out of the conscription he advocated for. Through his political connections and intense pleading, he got his draft exemption and went to Washington instead. Initially, he was there to help run the war as assistant to the Secretary of War Newton D. Baker. Yet, a few months later, he was sent to help direct “Colonel” Edward Mandell House's secret conclave of historians and social scientists, known as The Inquiry, setting out to plan the blueprint of the future peace treaty and the post-war order. Because of its nature, The Inquiry was swamped either with members of various groups linked with the Rhodes Crowd and the Houses of Morgan and Rockefeller, or with future pupils of Milner’s Kindergarten and associates of the ‘oiligarchy’-Wall Street-established think tanks. In view of needing to push a set of policies which must be accepted by their citizenry, filling these organisations with like-minded collectivist intellectuals was of paramount importance. In 1922, surmising from his experience and precisely exemplifying the intelligentsia’s belief, Lippmann concluded that for democracy to function efficiently, public opinion had to be manipulated into accepting the narratives and agendas of an elite, through “a specialized class whose personal interests reach beyond the locality.” Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” Sadly, the cabal never ceased to engage in an information war against the populace to enslave Mankind under a world government. Ergo, they never stopped originating new think tanks and foundations to accomplish this mission, expanding incessantly the Deep State Milieux, of which the RIIA is their muse, acting as the model for the milieux that followed. Exactly, the secretive manner the discussions and talks proceed abide by the Chatham House Rule, named after the RIIA’s address. Speaking of which, the RIIA, epitomising the method of working of these NWO organisations, set up a committee to supervise writing a multi-volume history of the Paris Peace Conference. Indubitably, this committee was financed by a gift from Thomas W. Lamont, a Morgan partner. In a complete Orwellian fashion, they figured out if they sought to control the world in the future, they must control the masses’ understanding of History, both contemporary and past events. Throughout the ages, the elites have come up with different theses for justifying their privileged and supercilious posture. In ancient times, the rulers were deemed to be blessed with the unique ability to hear, read and interpret the divine commands or were themselves descendants of the gods. Fast-forwarding to the Middle Ages and the medieval period, the level of absurdity dimed down. At this time, it was asserted that the kings had the God-given right to rule over their subjects. Now, with the advent of liberalism and the secular State, in the modern era, religion was substituted by science, allegedly. Instead of religious dogmas and beliefs, society would function according to professed scientific grounds. As I have demonstrated, this resulted in the ideological revolution for the socialisation of the economy. Furthermore, a scientific explanation for the meteoric rise of the highly successful industrialists and financiers, reaching and even surpassing the level of prominence of the old royal dynasties in Europe, was promptly required. Spawning from biological evolution theory, Darwinism in particular, eugenics served the clique’s wishes like a charm. After reading his half-cousin work, Francis Galton began to apply Darwin’s theory to humans. As a matter of fact, eugenics was coined by Galton, basically meaning “well-born”. These cousins drew inspiration from a bunch of ideas that were circulating around the 1850’s. When studying hereditary characteristics in pea plants, Gregor Mendel was able to determine that certain characteristics were being passed on and that these could be determined and predicted. Meanwhile, Herbert Spencer was talking about the “survival of the fittest” with the same thread running through there. Therefore, Galton is essentially taking all of these ideas, plus observing and identifying patterns. Essentially, he came up with this concept that through studying human characteristics one could, if he chose to, breed superior human beings. Evidently, eugenics is a movement among the elite to eradicate what they regard as the inferior classes, i.e., the lower social, racial and ethnic classes. On the whole, anyone who fails to reach their standards must be kept in check or eradicated. What they aim to do is genetically engineer themselves to a superior level, leaving the remaining population that they permit to exist beneath them powerless, without the potential nor the skills to overthrow them. Patently, the peasants must always be subservient to their lords. Fuelled by the endorsement of America's rich and powerful, the field of eugenics transformed from the peculiar novelty for a few bookworms into the social cause of an entire generation. By the 1920’s, everyone who was anyone was extolling the need to eradicate the defective “germ-plasm” of the lower stock from the human population. Accordingly, a variety of projects and policies were pursued and enacted to effect this wicked cause. What started in the British countryside with Galton, made across the Atlantic with a roar only due to the efforts by the Harvard-trained zoologist Charles Davenport. After asking the Carnegie Institute for funding, at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory they set up an institute to study eugenics. Eventually, with some Harriman and Rockefeller money in the mix, this evolved into the Eugenics Records Office. Established in 1910, its mission was to register the genetic background of every single man, woman and child in America (and, in due time, the world), so that every person could be categorised by their family line and assigned a genetic rating. Once completed, those with the lowest eugenic value could be eliminated from the gene pool. Owing to their support of forced sterilisation and other policies of that sort, as well as the cabal’s financing and backing of the despotic and totalitarian movements emerging in Europe, eugenicists’ days were numbered. Seeing that by the mid-1930’s eugenics was synonymous with the most terribly inhumane practices of that day, viewed as being part only in an evil regime like the one in Germany at the time, its advocates had to disguise themselves. As American Eugenics Society co-founder Frederick Osborne wrote: “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under a name other than eugenics.” Thus, he moved the American Eugenics Society into the offices of John D. Rockefeller III's Population Council, becoming its president in 1957. Following the steps of his father and grandfather before him, JDR3 had learned to use philanthropy and largesse as a mask for his true intention: control. Luckily for us, that mask fell when he penned a draft of the Council's charter revealing the organisation's true purpose. According to him, the Council would “promote research and apply existing knowledge to help develop such changes in the attitudes, habits and environmental pressures affecting the life of human beings, so that within every social and economic grouping, parents who are above the average in intelligence, quality of personality and affection will tend to have larger than average families.” Clearly, one immediately reckons that the population control narrative can easily be mistaken for the environmental movement. Indeed, because the idea of having a bunch of intellectual snobs and their pretentious financiers classifying our worthiness as human beings is deemed horribly appalling by any sane person, they had to repackage it and sell it to the public under a different brand; one that gathered massive support by the general population. At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilisation is dysgenic instead of eugenic; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” Joining the Rockefellers in shaping the international environmental movement were their fellow ‘oiligarchs’ across the Old World. In turn, facilitating the transition from eugenics to population control to environmentalism was committed eugenicist Julian Huxley – President of the British Eugenics Society from 1959 to 1962 –, brother of Brave New World – how apropos – author Aldous Huxley and grandson of ‘Darwin's bulldog’ TH Huxley. In 1946, as the founding director of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Huxley wrote in the agency's founding document about the need to find ways to make the tenets of eugenics politically viable once more. Manifestly, the United Nations, which Rockefeller-donated address is not even under the jurisdiction of any form of government, is the entity that will one day be the world government. That being the case, UNESCO is its division of indoctrination, working to manipulate the countries’ educational systems and integrate media outlets to adhere to the cabal’s globalist message and quest. Having said this, eugenics mutated into the new, more sanctimonious and sweeping rendition. Now, the clique could kill two birds with one stone. In fact, killing has been a major part of their plan. The ‘feeble-minded’ would still be culled, while the NWO elite would gain more control, power and consolidation. As we can see, this is what happened and was made possible by the masses’ acquiescence. In 1972, the privately funded think tank Club of Rome (CoR) published The Limits to Growth. As we saw with the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 hoax, the CoR used computer models to predict what it decreed were the complex problems faced by the entire planet: the “world problematique”. The opinions offered by the CoR derived from the commissioned work of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s system dynamic World3 model. This model assumed that the growing global population would deplete natural resources and pollute the environment to the point where “overshoot and collapse” would inevitably occur.
Far from a scientific fact, this was simply a suggested scenario. So far, none of the predictions made by the World3 model have come to pass. The scientific debate on the claims and statistical trickery made in The Limits to Growth has been prolific. However, ignoring all doubts, the World3 model was the pivotal aspect of the paradigm of the sustainable development and environmental policies. As always, the Rockefeller family and the remaining ‘oiligarchs’ and ‘banksters’ were there to provide the funding and organisational patronage to steer this burgeoning movement toward their own goals. Perplexingly, the colossal level of hypocrisy hardly makes anyone pause. After spending almost a century extracting the resources from the ground and manufacturing the goods that made them incredibly wealthy, and polluting the planet in its process, now these magnates dare to blame Humanity as a whole for the purported crimes of resource depletion, pollution and ecological catastrophe. Inevitably, the CoR summed up their rationale the best: “The real enemy, then, is humanity itself” (page 115). Unquestionably, the anthropogenic climate change theory – before that it was labelled Global Warming and before that the narrative was Global Cooling – is merely the thesis of this Hegelian dialectic. In summary, the Hegelian dialectic consists of a synthetic solution (synthesis) being presented to two contradictory propositions (thesis and antithesis). The synthesis is advanced only when the people being manipulated take the proposition that introduces the pre-determined agenda. Ergo, for the antithesis of the climate change swindle is to essentially go back to the precarious living of the medieval period at best, the populace will gravitate to the more passable prearranged solution which is to implement ridiculous ‘green’ schemes such as the Green New Deal and the Energy Transition. Inevitably, these initiatives are mere Trojan horses to surreptitiously slip what the banking cabal really clamours for: all individuals and countries to submit their sovereignty to the unelected, totalitarian UN. To conclude, this topic leads us to the issue of neo-feudalism warned by Carroll Quigley above. Consequently, their endgame is to finally implement the century-old vision of Technocracy. On account of this theme’s intricacy, there is a lot to discuss and, hence, we will have to continue another day, on the next episode.
0 Comments
|
AuthorDaniel Gomes Luís Archives
March 2024
Categories |